The projections are becoming reality
I have now switched to a weekly update.
Projections from the IHME have turned out to be correct for European countries so far. Therefore, winter projections could become a reality in which Germany will be faced with much higher death numbers than in April and a lockdown prolonged not only into December but into January with hospital resources running scarce in some regions. France, on the other side, should see a decline in fatalities in January, which will free hospital resources for neighbouring countries. The U.S. death numbers are projected to increase from their already-high to higher with a plateau in January. California and Washington will see a strong increase of deaths and hospital resources running thin in early 2021, while New York State will remain the outlier and add only moderately to the death toll. If Trump were to be reelected, he would be faced with a devastating situation that he helped create and as a consequence, the Republican party could be punished at the polls and excluded from power for years to come. China, whose death numbers are projected to remain low, will stand stronger than ever and it will gain even more political and economical power. Tunisia seems to have hit a peak in new infections; death numbers are projected to peak in early winter. ICU beds are are already filled and triaging will be inevitable until the burden eases in early 2021. Britain is projected to increase its death numbers to well below the April peak but, unlike Germany, will be faced with a systemic shortage of hospital beds. Sweden's numbers increase 1-2 months after their European cousins. As a consequence, deaths are projected to peak only in February, to levels higher than those in April, which could then cause a shortage of ICU beds. By that time its neighbours will have low numbers again and will be able to take in patients.
Daily Infections | Daily Deaths | Daily Positve Rate | R | Projection | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil | 11.1 ↗︎ | 0.204 ↘︎ | 50.0% | ↘︎ | |
US minus 3 | 26.0 ↗︎ | 0.271 ↗︎ | 03.9% ↓ | 1.11 ↑ | ↗︎ |
California | 10.9 ↗︎ | 0.112 ↗︎ | 03.1% ↗︎ | 1.11 ↗︎ | ⬆︎ |
Washington | 9.4 ↗︎ | 0.131 ↗︎ | 04.6% ↗︎ | 1.06 ↗︎ | ⬆︎ |
New York | 10.0 ↗︎ | 0.073 ↗︎ | 01.5% ↗︎ | 1.10 ↗︎ | → |
France | 62.0 ↑ | 0.438 ↑ | 20.0% ↑ | 1.42 ↗︎ | ⇅ |
Britain | 33.4 ↗︎ | 0.349 ↑ | 07.8% ↗︎ | 1.2 ↘︎ | ↗︎ |
Tunisia | 11.2 → | 0.529 ↑ | 41.3% ↗︎ | ⇅ | |
Sweden | 18.9 ↑ | 0.035 → | 05.6% ↑ | ↑ | |
Germany | 17.3 ↑ | 0.077 ↑ | 05.2% ↗︎ | 1.21 ↘︎ | ⬆︎ |
China | 00.0 → | 0.000 → | → |
We have learnt a few things from the early days of the pandemic:
Unfortunately, we Europeans and probably others too, seem to have forgotten what exponential growth means. We were stunned when it happened in March and we are stunned again now.
In the summer, we ignored the voices of smart people who have studied numbers for all their lives. We thought that we were smarter because we understood numbers too and we did not see anybody getting sick around us. The press did its part by making us believe that the first "wave" was over, while it had really only slowed down. So we travelled to far-away places and had drinks with people of unknown Corona status. We did not ready our education system for things to come or prepared our restaurants for proper ventilation. We did not invest heavily in home tests nor did we create adequate protection for those who work for our food and for our health. We did not heed the warning about deficiencies in tracing of the infected and did not hire more people, just as we failed to increase the workforce in the hospitals.
What we were good at, though, was debating about what to do. Turning in circles. And secretly hoping that science might be wrong.
So, when numbers will have come down again in two months or so, here is what we could do:
We will then have a real chance to brave the next pandemic, just like the Pacific-Eastern nations (e.g. Taiwan) have braved the current one.